| To: | "R.Measures" <r@somis.org>, g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] Is solid Cu 600VAC house wire, good for tank Âtoroids? |
| From: | Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk> |
| Reply-to: | g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk |
| Date: | Thu, 5 Jan 2006 11:33:13 +0100 (CET) |
| List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
Rich said: >Sometimes cheaper turns out to be way more expensive.< This is very true, but a lot of CEOs (and other managers, for that matter) can't see it! 73 Peter G3RZP _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Is solid Cu 600VAC house wire, good for tank ?toroids?, R . Measures |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Measuring Q with an SWR analyzer, Karl-Arne Markström |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Is solid Cu 600VAC house wire, good for tank Âtoroids?, Peter Chadwick |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Is solid Cu 600VAC house wire, good for tank ?toroids?, R . Measures |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |