Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] *** SPAM *** Re: Antenna traps

To: g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk
Subject: Re: [Amps] *** SPAM *** Re: Antenna traps
From: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:48:44 -0800
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
On Dec 16, 2005, at 12:38 AM, Peter Chadwick wrote:

> Rich said:
>
> >** ?An L-network always has the lowest Q possible. ?Is mo' Q mo' 
> betta?<
>
> Rubbish. Do the math. The Q is the sq.rt of the impedance ratio -1.
>
> So the bigger the impedance transformation, the higher?the working Q.

correct

> In any two variable system, Qw is an uncontrolled variable.

correct

> A?3 variable network allows Q to be?defined. That's the advantage of 
> the T or pi (which is the dual of the T).

Peter -- can one choose to use a Q with a T that is lower than that 
which results with an L?
>
> 73
>
> Peter G3RZP
>
> ?
>
> ?

Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734.  www.somis.org

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>