To: | g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] *** SPAM *** Re: 220V wiring: Was Question about safetyground connection |
From: | R.Measures <r@somis.org> |
Date: | Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:48:45 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
On Nov 18, 2005, at 8:29 AM, Peter Chadwick wrote: > Rich said: > > ? > > >Surely, but isn't it more important to have additional safety instead > >of dependable electricity? > > ? > > That is an argument for no electricity at all. No way. Potentials of up to 36v are fairly safe -- except for snails of course. > Like the Amish -? I doubt many of them get electrocuted. Yeah, but now we know that the way some Amish children are treated is shocking. > > ? > > 73 > > ? > > Peter SM/G3RZP > > > > > Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Ultimate safety for house wiring, R . Measures |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Ultimate safety for house wiring, R . Measures |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] *** SPAM *** Re: 220V wiring: Was Question about safetyground connection, Peter Chadwick |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] *** SPAM *** Re: 220V wiring: Was Question about safetyground connection, Peter Chadwick |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |