Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Testing filament xfmr

To: g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk
Subject: Re: [Amps] Testing filament xfmr
From: David Kirkby <david.kirkby@onetel.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:17:58 +0100
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Peter Chadwick wrote:
> Simpler is to connect an ammeter  across the secondary, feed the 
> primary from a Variac and wind up the Variac until trhe desired filament 
> current flows. then leave it for a time and see how hot it gets. 

The classic short circuit test.

> The 
> probability is that most of the losses will be copper losses: 

agreed

> leave it 
> on full primary with open circuit secondary to get an idea of how much 
> iron loss there is by the temp rise.

It's a long time since I did this, but the short and open circuit tests 
give you copper and iron losses respectively. I think you can show that 
theoretically copper_loss == iron_loss for maximum efficiency, but the 
transformer would no doubt have been wound on a suitable former, rather 
than one that is theoretically optimal.

I can't really see how you could determine the temperature rise too 
easily by this.

It's not my area of expertise, but I would have thought a load resistor 
a safer bet.


-- 
David Kirkby,
G8WRB

Please check out http://www.g8wrb.org/
of if you live in Essex http://www.southminster-branch-line.org.uk/


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>