Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 31, Issue 60

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 31, Issue 60
From: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Reply-to: craxd1@verizon.net
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 14:31:31 -0400
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Dennis,

I highly doubt there are just a small handfull of us that could construct a 
tubed piece of equipmet like a transceiver. There's only one US manufacturer I 
know of left making receiving type tubes which is Western Electric. Of course 
all theirs are audio tubes I think and really high priced. The only way MPD 
(GE) will now if it's something for the government or is what they told me back 
in 1989. They don't teach one i-oughtta thing about vacuum tubes in the schools 
anymore, just make a small mention of them.

Best,

Will

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 8/1/05 at 12:27 PM Dennis12Amplify@aol.com wrote:

>In a message dated 8/1/05 10:37:06 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
>wlfuqu00@uky.edu writes:
>
>OK, I have got to reply.
>
>Most of the hams  that build amplifiers for 11 meter operators and 
>those that know little  about RF are illegal CBers that have taken the 
>relative easy exams and  gotten ham tickets and are operating their ham
>rigs 
>on CB and Ham  bands.
> 
> Unfortunately,  those demons were out of the box LONG BEFORE incentive 
>licensing and no-code  licensing came along!
> 
> The amateurs that  started this mess were already building and selling 
>illegal (non-type  accepted) sweep tube linears back in the 60's! 
> 
> Most of the  original culprits are dead now but they died  wealthy!
> 
> I know because I am  old enough to have been around in those days and
>know 
>that a lot of them were  built in Illinois, and many were built right here
>in 
>the Joliet area.... The  other 'hotspots' were Scottsbluff Nebraska,
>Wawassee 
>and Elkhart Indiana,  Memphis Tennessee, and a number of places in New
>Jersey 
>and  California.
> 
> Hams that make amplifiers for illegal CB use and those 
>that  use their ham gear out of band  are the most despicable in my  mind.
> 
> I agree with you completely!
> 
> I also feel the same way about hams complaining 'after  the fact' about a 
>monster that was created entirely by greedy ham operators  trying to sell
>their 
>old low band HF AM 'boat anchor' equipment for as much  money as they
>possibly 
>could just so they could get into VHF FM, and the  associated repeaters, 
>which was the wave of the future back then.  
>That HF AM equipment they were trying to sell was worthless to  other HAM 
>operators, but was priceless to a CB operator with deep pockets; so  guess
>who 
>the 'smart' hams sold all their old HF AM equipment, and their  linears,
>to???
> 
> I blame the HAM  community for creating this monster by not self-policing 
>themselves like they  should have.
> 
> It was their little  'secret' source of cash for quite a few years, and
>so 
>many amateur operators  were involved that it was like a bad habit that
>was 
>unofficially accepted and  condoned but rarely, if ever, spoken of on the 
>air....
> 
>  A license is an an agreement with the Government and Society  that you
>will 
>abide the law and these activities violate those laws.   If you do so, 
>giving up your license is the right thing to  do.
>
>
> You also agree to  provide emergency radio services for this country in a 
>National Emergency; and  I know of very few amateurs who could build a 
>transmitter or a receiver from  scratch if they had to, especially if
>tubes were  
>involved....
> 
>I can, and I have, done  both. 
>Can  you?
> 
> After the first  high altitude explosion and it's associated EMP, the 
>'appliance HAM operators'  will be totally out of service and sitting on
>their hands 
>while those CB radio  operators who have refused to give up their ancient 
>tube rigs will still be on  the air!
> 
> I believe that  there should be a licensing requirement for all HAM 
>operators to possess at  least one piece of EMP-PROOF communications gear
>in good 
>working condition,  and that there would be at least one day a year, (a
>contest 
>maybe), where they  would all have to put them on the air and make sure
>they 
>were still in good  working condition and to validate their emergency 
>communication  networks.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>Dennis  O.
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps



_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>