To: | amps@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] Standby tubes (was: Even more power solid-state amp's) |
From: | "Will Matney" <craxd1@ezwv.com> |
Reply-to: | craxd1@ezwv.com |
Date: | Fri, 01 Apr 2005 23:16:41 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
Yes sir, sure is. Now that IS QRO! Best, Will *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 4/1/05 at 6:36 PM kenw2dtc wrote: >"This one is just outside of Cincinnatti. It was something like 500,000 >watts if I recall or maybe a little more." > >Will, >Is this the big rig you were speaking about? > >http://hawkins.pair.com/wlw.shtml > >73, >Ken W2DTC > > > >_______________________________________________ >Amps mailing list >Amps@contesting.com >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] need a channel 11 VHF high band TX? tspa, Dr. William J. Schmidt, II |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Standby tubes (was: Even more power solid-state amp's), Will Matney |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Standby tubes (was: Even more power solid-state amp's), kenw2dtc |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Standby tubes (was: Even more power solid-state amp's), Radioal |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |