In my opinion, the FCC is more concerned with non-hetero Teletubbies,
Janet Jackson's mammaries, and catering to the religious-right /
Neo-con agenda than they are about us Hams.
On Mar 21, 2005, at 9:19 AM, Mark Hill wrote:
> Gary,
>
> Indeed so! When replying to the FCC, I believe the text goes something
> like: "I dare not run QRP because I only have a 10k element for my
> Bird
> and if I don't get the pointer to top-scale, I cannot measure my power
> accurately!"
>
> Regards.
>
> Mark.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> At 16:41 21/03/2005, Gary Schafer wrote:
>> Guys, keep in mind that 5% accuracy spec is of FULL scale. That means
>> that
>> a 2500 watt slug has +- 125 watt accuracy at ANY part of the scale.
>> If you read 1000 watts on the meter with the 2500 watt slug the actual
>> power could be from 875 to 1125 watts and still be in spec! That's
>> 12%.
>>
>> At 250 watts on that same slug the error is +- 50%.
>>
>> The lower you get on the scale the worse the accuracy will become.
>>
>> 73
>> Gary K4FMX
>
> *******************************************
> Mark Hill - G4FPH
> E-mail: g4fph@mjha.co.uk
> Current web pages at: www.qsl.net/g4fph
> Old web pages at: www.g4fph.freeserve.co.uk
> -------------------------------------------
> Dipoles resonant on 1942/3695/7065 kHz
> 2 ele delta loop beam resonant on 14180 kHz
> -------------------------------------------
> Remember - SIDE for HV safety:
> S witch off
> I solate
> D ump
> E arth
> *******************************************
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|