To: | Reflector Amps <Amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [Amps] Testing a tuner |
From: | Rob & Terri Sherwood <rob@sherweng.com> |
Date: | Sun, 09 Jan 2005 14:23:54 -0700 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
If the League is really only using resistive loads, then they could make
the loads reactive with inductors or capacitors. This would be time
consuming, but what other option do they have? The balanced L network
tuners I have tried matched fine into resistors on 20 meters and above,
but hooking them to a real antenna was another story. On the balanced L network tuners, putting a 10 - 100 pF variable capacitor on the input solved virtually all my matching limitations. What does this imply? In every case the output Z was higher than 50 ohms because swapping the L network capacitor to the input always made the matching worse. So why did converting it to a Pi from an L make such an improvement? The balun was always on the transmitter side. I am wondering if one could build a modern Matchbox with the following: Two roller inductors in line mechanically and driven by a turns counter, and the link located in the middle between the two roller inductors. Then of course we need a split stator and a dual differential capacitor. Someone mentioned the issue of coupling between the balanced L network coils. If there is too much mutual coupling between the coils, what will happen? _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Link coupling, R . Measures |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Testing a tuner, Tomm Aldridge |
Previous by Thread: | [Amps] Re: AMPS Link coupling, R . Measures |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Testing a tuner, Tomm Aldridge |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |