Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] input matching question on the YC156?

To: craxd1@ezwv.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] input matching question on the YC156?
From: "Harold B. Mandel" <ka1xo@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 13:37:56 -0400
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Gentlemen,

In reading the posts below do I detect a tendency to use a HV relay
to switch the HV on and off every time the amplifier is keyed?

Using the 3CPX5000 scenario posted before, would then the
sequence (abridged) be:

1. Apply HV-  (B- as Will espouses, below).
2. Apply Bias.
3. Trigger antenna relays.
4. Apply drive voltage.

5. Remove Dive voltage.
6. Remove Bias.
7. Remove HV-
8. Unpick antenna relays.

This sounds like a switching sequence nightmare! 
If I'm running 4KV at 2 amperes on the plates, I need to 
run serious vacuum relays (and I do, I do!), but they
are huge and slow. I could see all this in a setup that 
had long turn-around Tx/Rx, like RTTY bulletin stations,
but what happens to PSK31, AMTOR and contesting
operators when they want to "get up and go?"

Hal Mandel
W4HBM


> >Is this true even when the tube is biased into cutoff?  I've owned
> >four commercially-made amps and all of them apply HV as soon as the
> >power switch is turned on, but all four have the tube biased into
>>cutoff.  Are you saying that is a design error?
>- Bill 

> In any amps I've made, I did kill the B- lead for the HV until the 
> antenna relay pulled in even though it was biased to cutoff on idle. 
> The reason being is that if the bias ever failed while the amp was at 
> idle,  you'd have a run-away situation that would happen fast. 
>-Will
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>