Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] RF exposure limits in reality

To: <jsb@digistar.com>, <Amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] RF exposure limits in reality
From: "RICHARD GEORGE" <k6kwq@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 18:52:08 -0700
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Buy the ARRL book on RF exposure. It is being used as an industry standard. 
Unless yor running a Kw for more then 7 minutes at a time at the distance you 
describe you are OK. It is not accumalative.




K6KWQ Dick "12 Volt radios are for wimps, real radios can kill you" Still can't 
make it go QRO with "More Power"
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: jsb@digistar.com 
  To: Amps@contesting.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 11:11 AM
  Subject: [Amps] RF exposure limits in reality



  Does anyone have any information as to "real life" exposure limits for
  adults, children and newborns at various frequencies?  I've seen the
  generic exposure limit ratings that the FCC publishes for dipoles but was
  wondering if there were some figures that clearly state the minimum safe
  distance for various frequencies and power levels.

  If http://www.qsl.net/southsidearc/rfx.html#hfhorizontal is accurate then
  I'll go by that then.


  I'm expecting a baby soon and my dipoles are hanging from a push up mast
  which is mounted to the same side of the house as the bedrooms.  I run CW
  and am curious how I need to alter my operating practice.


  Thanks,
  Jason

  _______________________________________________
  Amps mailing list
  Amps@contesting.com
  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>