To: | "Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.co.uk> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] Line Isolators for RF feedback |
From: | R.Measures <r@somis.org> |
Date: | Sun, 8 Aug 2004 02:28:30 -0700 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
On Aug 7, 2004, at 1:18 AM, Ian White, G3SEK wrote: R. Measures wrote:I'll stick with my bead balun -- it fixed all the RF problems I was having, so unless it bursts This is according to the seller or the manufacturer? How does the ferrite material know the difference between tuned-circuit RF and balun RF?. Permag Pacific is a manufacturer, and their catalog says Nothing about different frequency ratings for one-turn (bead-balun) applications and multi-turn applications.
... and crack, and fall off.
So the rule is add beads until they don't smoke.
Ian -- How would you fix a half-wave dipole so that it becomes more balanced? It seems to me that the problem is with the feedline being unbalanced -- i. e., building an interface (balun) between the naturally balanced antenna and its unbalanced coax feedline. 3. High power. True, Ian, but they live next door to each other.
Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
Previous by Date: | [Amps] HD Cap Needed, Bob Maser |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Amps] 40400A Datasheet needed, Bill Coleman N2BC |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Line Isolators for RF feedback, Ian White, G3SEK |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Line Isolators for RF feedback, Ian White, G3SEK |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |