To: | amps@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] Re: Drake L7 newbie - Summary |
From: | "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk> |
Reply-to: | "Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.co.uk> |
Date: | Thu, 1 Apr 2004 09:14:26 +0100 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
rlm wrote: [I've changed the topic order slightly here] Providing the changeover sequencing is correct. It's best to keep the tube cut off until after the RF relays have made contact, so that the amp has an output load before it wakes up. And the reverse when changing back - cut off the tube, then remove its load.ð The aforementioned ECBS obviates the need for the relay. A stable amp shouldn't mind being operated with no load... but better safe than soldering! ð But still not fast enough to keep up with modern transceivers. That's a very good point. Full QSK switches between RX and TX much more often than semi-breakin does, but there is absolutely no difference in the speed and sequencing requirements whenever you hit the key. And the only difference when coming back to RX is in the hang time. It's just being used as a cheap and very poor fuse.ð Glitch resistors are not supposed to open. Their job is limit peak discharge current during a fault. The trouble with the stock 0.82-ohm resistor is that it does not limit current to a reasonable amount. Suppose you have?the worst case?fault (shorted tube?). 3000 V across a 10 Ohm resistor means 300 Amps. Not much of a current limiter. Should the Glitch resistor be a higher value? But the tube might not. For tubes up to the 1500W class, Eimac recommends limiting the current to 40A peak - see their Bulletin 17 at: http://www.cpii.com/eimac/eiapps.htm The revised edition of 'Care & Feeding' is also available for download, and contains a shorter summary of the same information. In practice Eimac's 40A limit seems very conservative, as many amateur amps have discovered by using no glitch resistor at all... but it's still on the statute books. [I'll be off e-mail now for 10 days. Listen out for GM3SEK... CUL]
http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] SB-221 Why is the the variable load capacitor onlycrimpedto the ..., Ian White, G3SEK |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Amps] dummy load., on4kj |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] SB-221 Why is the the variable load capacitor onlycrimpedto the ..., Ian White, G3SEK |
Next by Thread: | [Amps] dummy load., on4kj |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |