>I wonder what the market is like for this device. Would Ham OEMs find this
>an attractive component when the majority have turned to 4x800? I realize
>they could eliminate the screen ps and various protective circuits which all
>contribute to the 'cost of goods' but does that compensate for the higher
>tube price and filament requirements.
? - Ed - The advantages of the __D7 are instant-on, no gold plating on
the grid, and the use of a commonly-available, inexpensive socket.
However, at this power-level, my choice would be the 3cx1000A7 because it
has more peak emission and less feedback-C.
>
>Eimac (currently) has this tube listed in the Ham section but not in the
>other (broadcast, communications) sections. I wonder if this is an
>oversight, or really signifies the intended market.
>
>I hope it is a big success in any case.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Gärdin Petter" <petter.gardin@aerotechtelub.se>
>To: "AMPS" <amps@contesting.com>
>Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 2:08 AM
>Subject: SV: [Amps] 3CX1500D7
>
>
>> http://www.cpii.com/eimac/catalog/172150.htm
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|