To: | amps@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] roller L standard value per meter band |
From: | "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk> |
Reply-to: | "Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.co.uk> |
Date: | Sun, 23 Nov 2003 08:38:53 +0000 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
skipp isaham wrote:
Hello gang, - The 4cx1000 project that some of you helped locate the original text for... mentions the roller L value is set about .16uh per meter of operation. 40 meters would be about 6.4uh of roller inductance. Is this a generic roller value for this size of operation? an approximation by the author? ...or a x-amount of L/meter value from some chart or table? I'm curious where this .16uh/meter value came from. Start from the optimum load impedance for that particular tube. Plug that value and a working Q into the design formulae for a Pi-network. The results are reactance values (in ohms) for L, C1 and C2. These values are independent of frequency. For a given reactance, the actual values in pF and uH must increase as the frequency goes down... so the trick is to convert them into pF and uH "per metre of wavelength." But also remember that some of our band names like "20m" and "40m" are actually several percent different from the true wavelengths.
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Amps] warm up times of tubes?, Neil Carr G0JHC |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Amps] 3cx800a7vs 3cpx800a7, Marc Wullaert |
Previous by Thread: | [Amps] roller L standard value per meter band, skipp isaham |
Next by Thread: | [Amps] 3cx800a7vs 3cpx800a7, Marc Wullaert |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |