To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [Amps] Re: 160M efficiency |
From: | peter.chadwick at Zarlink.Com (peter.chadwick@Zarlink.Com) |
Date: | Mon Jun 2 08:07:43 2003 |
So how did we get reasonable efficiency in plate modulated 160m PA stages, where we couldn't use a value as big as .01 uf to bypass the end of plate feed RF choke without serious effects on the modulation? Or was it that generally speaking, 160m AM tx's didn't cover so much of the HF spectrum, and were able to use much bigger plate chokes (1 or 2millihenry)? I seem to remember a number of professional tx's in those days that used push-pull RF stages, and so the problem would be a lot less. STill, not all of them did so. 73 Peter G3RZP |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Amps] Resonance in PiNetworks, peter.chadwick@Zarlink.Com |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Amps] Re: 160M efficiency, Jeffrey Madore |
Previous by Thread: | [Amps] Resonance in PiNetworks, peter.chadwick@Zarlink.Com |
Next by Thread: | [Amps] Re: 160M efficiency, Phil Clements |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |