To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [AMPS] SB-220 |
From: | 2@mail.vcnet.com (Rich...) |
Date: | Thu, 14 Feb 2002 10:25:30 -0800 |
>Rich, > >Haven't tried the 50 wpm approach. Is it because it's easier on the tube(s)? > ? Yes, and it allows an accurate tuneup with a power supply that won't maintain anode supply V with AØ. cheers, Paul - R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [AMPS] SB-220, Jim Strohm |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [AMPS] Re: Tubes with high transfer capacitance..Hrrrm??, Rich... |
Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] SB-220, Rich... |
Next by Thread: | [AMPS] SB-220, Jim Strohm |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |