Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] another myth on EMF

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] another myth on EMF
From: jtml@lanl.gov (John T. M. Lyles)
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 09:39:12 -0700
Cellphones cause brain tumors......
In study after study, the link of 800-1800 MHz RF emissions to cancer 
has NOT been scientifically proven. RF heating, some affects on 
nerves, auditory affects at pulsed rep rates,  but the energy from RF 
on cells is low compared to the ioning energy from nuclear phenomina.

For about 20 years now, I have looked at dozens of research reports, 
papers and books, on this very subject, and there is no such proof 
out there. Every study can be interpreted either way. Studies show 
that even the studies are flawed. It is very difficult to prove that 
RF causes cancer. Its difficult to prove a lot of things which might 
be suggested to cause cancer. Diet, smoking, genetics (a big one), 
stress, some chemical exposures - all may cause cancer. Male tower 
workers getting breast  cancer, ham radio operators develop brain 
tumors, cellphone users get cancer more frequently, children living 
near a substation getting leukemia, certain configurations of power 
line conductors causing more risk, and on and on and on. The media, 
and a lot of hypocritical phone users seem to continue to promote the 
cellphone myth. There is a lot of truth that cellphones cause auto 
accidents. And the media always says that 'big brother' is trying to 
suppress information, i.e., the lobbyists for cellphone companies and 
providers and Motorola, Nokia, etc. And what is the media interest: 
To sell more papers, get more listeners, win ratings for their 
market, get more advertisements. What a vicious circle.

Recently, the city of Santa Fe, NM tried to ban cell towers for 
various political, esthetic and other reasons. The very same myths 
were brought up, by many of the same people who also confuse nuclear 
radiation with RF. (it radiates, right?). Needless to say, it was 
hilarious reading their statements and 'scientific evidence' in the 
news.
And it is sad to know that unqualified opinionated people are 
influencing the direction of decisions. These same people would not 
think twice about ~using~ a cellphone, however, and have the silly 
things ringing at them.

When this technically savy discussion on RF amplifiers starts to 
degrade into a forum similar to what you can tune into in your local 
paper and TV news, its time to find a more challenging group.

K5PRO
John
-- 

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>