Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] info on resonant chokes II

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] info on resonant chokes II
From: jtml@lanl.gov (John T. M. Lyles)
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 13:41:56 -0600
  A couple of comments are warranted from the snippets of QSO that 
were reprinted earlier:

At 11:45 PM -0400 10/24/01, 2@vc.net wrote:
>//  Regulation is not the reason for using a resonant-choke filter.  With
>a capacitor filter, the peak current is c. 10x higher on the electric

A choke filter alone would also do. Or getting heavier service 
installed for such problems.  For systems which may have the load 
removed and don't want giant chokes on L input filters, the resonant 
approach offers voltage regulation better than large swinging chokes. 
An L input filter (which limits inrush during the rectification cycle)
degenerates into a capacitive input filter when the L is too small to 
reach critical value at light load current. There is a significant 
rise in voltage when the capacitor charges to peak. This is 
unregulated....

At 11:45 PM -0400 10/24/01, Jim, VE7RF was quoted as writing:
>  >To  get  from  5%  ripple  down  to <1%   is  a  piece  o
>>cake   with  a  simple  cap  input  filter +  a  3  phase   diode/plate
>  >xfmr  setup.

That's a fact - with 3 phase full wave rectified power supplies, 
there is very little reason to use a big C or a big L since the 
ripple voltage is already that low. Unless you have extreme phase 
unbalance! So the inrush current is also low. 3 phase makes 
transmitter designers much happier. Suprising that Collins used a 3 
phase supply AND a resonant filter.

73
K5PRO
John
-- 

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>