Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Henry 4K Ultra vs. 3K Classic X Mk II

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Henry 4K Ultra vs. 3K Classic X Mk II
From: k1xt@hotmail.com (bill thomas)
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 08:55:51 -0500



>From: Mike Wapner <MWapner@Vetronix.com>
>To: "'amps@contesting.com'" <amps@contesting.com>
>Subject: [AMPS] Henry 4K Ultra vs. 3K Classic X Mk II
To: <amps@contesting.com>
>Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 14:07:52 -0700
>
>
>Henry 4K Ultra (3CX1500A7) vs.
>Henry 3K Classic X MkII (3CX1200A7)
> > I have the opportunity to purchase one of these two amps.  Any help with
> > the pros/cons of each would be appreciated.  Thanks.  Mike-K6QD
>
>

I have a Henry 3K Classic X with a 3cx1500a7 and it has worked flawlessly 
for me.  Thirty-five to forty watts in gives me 1500 out. It's much easier 
to find 3cx1500a7 tubes on the second market as well as pullouts.  They are 
a very prolific tube.  Don't mess with the suppresor.  There is no need to.

Bill k1xt

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>