Peter Chadwick wrote:
Hi Peter,
My own experiences with 4 different DSP audio filters are modest
and most no good.
I tried often to read ssb or cw signals 'better' near the noise floor
with DSP boxes. Believe me, I did not find a situation 'better' with
DSP on and noise reduction on.
Perhaps hams must wait until the specs grow up at lower cost. The
present is bright (a PR gag), but the future will be much better - hi.
Nice comments from you.
Uwe, DL9NC
> Tom said:
>
> >Near the top of receiver performance is a ~$600 radio, with
> >conventional filters.
>
> Tom, you're not trying to tell us that DSP is not the be-all and end-all, best
> thing since sliced bread, guaranteed snake oil cure for fogs, high wind and
> indigestion, helps babies while teething, that people would have us believe,
> are
> you? Shame on you! Go wash your mouth out! You're a heretic.
>
> If it's digital, it's got to be good. Everybody says so.
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|