-----Original Message-----
From: owner-amps@contesting.com [mailto:owner-amps@contesting.com]
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 10:19 PM
To: amps-approval@contesting.com
Subject: BOUNCE amps@contesting.com : Non-member submission from [Morel
Grunberg <Q86@MISMAIL.MIS.ELEX.CO.IL>]
>From kn6dv@as.net Tue Jul 3 01:19:15 2001
Received: from tparelay.telradnetworks.co.il ([62.90.58.229])
by contesting.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f635JBW31721
for <amps@contesting.com>; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 01:19:12 -0400
Received: from mailgw.telrad.co.il (mailgw.telrad.co.il [62.90.58.230])
by tparelay.telradnetworks.co.il (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA00920
for <amps@contesting.com>; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 08:14:07 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from tpamail.telradnetworks.co.il ([141.226.78.5])
by mailgw.telrad.co.il (NAVIEG 2.1 bld 63) with SMTP id
M2001070308125915878
; Tue, 03 Jul 2001 08:12:59 +0200
Received: from tpa-mail1.telradnetworks.co.il
(tpa-mail1.telradnetworks.co.il [141.226.76.57])
by tpamail.telradnetworks.co.il (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
IAA22086;
Tue, 3 Jul 2001 08:19:02 +0300 (IDT)
Received: by tpa-mail1.telradnetworks.co.il with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2650.21)
id <LAYPAZDT>; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 08:18:03 +0200
Message-ID:
<7388365BE5E4D411A3810002A50915587363AD@mail3.telradnetworks.co.il>
From: Morel Grunberg <Q86@MISMAIL.MIS.ELEX.CO.IL>
To: "'chuck'" <k8cpa@arrl.net>, amps@contesting.com
Subject: RE: [AMPS] ACOM Amps
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 08:21:13 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain
Hi Chuck,
Could you explain what exactly are the reasons you beleive that ?
73
Morel
4X1AD
> -----Original Message-----
> From: chuck [SMTP:k8cpa@arrl.net]
> Sent: Mon July 02 2001 19:22
> To: amps@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [AMPS] ACOM Amps
>
>
> QRO Amps are better. Period.
>
>
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|