| To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [AMPS] Voltage Doublers |
| From: | Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK) |
| Date: | Wed, 16 May 2001 19:38:49 +0100 |
I just wrote:
>I'd still guess that truly equivalent transformers - ones that gave
>exactly the same voltage regulation - would come out very similar in
>size, and the FWB one would be significantly lighter because it would
>have to use much more copper (half the turns but much more than twice
>the cross-section).
Sorry - what I meant was, "the FW*D* one would be significantly
*heavier* because..."
73 from Ian G3SEK Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book'
'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
http://www.ifwtech.com/g3sek
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [AMPS] Voltage Doublers, Stephen Goldberg |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [AMPS] EER Amplifier Technique, Radio WC6W |
| Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] Voltage Doublers, <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK) |
| Next by Thread: | [AMPS] Voltage Doublers, 2 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |