To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [AMPS] AL-1500, AL-82, AL-1200, QRO??? |
From: | 2@vc.net (measures) |
Date: | Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:42:19 -0800 |
> >Hi Ian, > >Someone wrote: >> >in other words, can the fil. transformer CT handle a several kV spike >> > during a hv arc.? Putting the glitch R in the pos. lead eliminates >> >this problem. On a Henry 3KA, 2K4,et cetera, the 7.5-ohm glitch >> >resistor in the neg. circuitry is virtually certain to burn out >> >during a glitch. > >That is simply wrong Ian if the write of that pearl is implying a >negative lead glitch resistor is any different than a positive lead >glitch resistor. > >The filament transformer sees exactly the same "glitch voltage" no >matter what lead of the supply the glitch resistor is placed. The >only potential problem is insulation of the negative rail between the >filter capacitors and the glitch resistor. > > Eimac & Svetlana put the glitch R in the positive lead. To check out Mr. Rauch's statement, follow diagrams. end > > - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. end -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [AMPS] AL-1500, AL-82, AL-1200, QRO???, measures |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [AMPS] Re: AC Mains in Europe, CT HRD |
Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] AL-1500, AL-82, AL-1200, QRO???, <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK) |
Next by Thread: | [AMPS] AL-1500, AL-82, AL-1200, QRO???, measures |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |