>Fred Says:
>
> >How much power were you running?
>
>Rich Says:
>
>1400w
>
>Fred Says:
>
>strong odor of bologna (same as your comment later). PEP or average? No
>doubt PEP.
>
>Fred Says (repeat):
>
> >OK. That is what I understood to begin with. However, that does not allow
> >satisfying all load matching conditions with two L-network configurations.
> >
>
>Rich says:
>
>strong odor of bologna
>
>Fred Says:
>
>Showing your ignorance again. Review material concerning Network
>Matching. You will find load impedances that your network can not and will
>not be able to match.
>
Please specify one Z that the balanced L-network shown in the 1990 QST
article can not match.
> >Rich Says:
> >
> >If a conjugate match were provided, amplifier efficiency would be no more
> >than 50%.
> >
> >Fred Says (repeat):
> >
> >No. That is incorrect and a usual choice by those that don't understand
> >reflection loss/gain and conjugate matching.
>
>Rich Says:
>
>Apparently HQ did not understand it either.
>
>Fred Says:
>
>Who is HQ?
>
headquarters/Newington.
>The derived equation that follows detailed measurements is found in about
>every book discussing or including transmission line measurements regarding
>power delivered to the load. And it follows with detailed and carefully
>instrumented measurements.
>
>It is also recognized by the IEEE. But I suppose you and your
>contemporaries recognize them and the members as eggheads? <grin>. Continue
>to live in your world of Fantasy Rich.
>
>Goodby.
>
>Don't send me any more e-mail Rich as it is cluttering up my HDD and I
>will have a filter installed to remove anything and all you send or any
>other "stranger" may send.
>
[chortle]
>
>
- Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
end
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|