Rich- just saying 'enough' is avoiding the question. My interpretation of
the Eimac comment is that it rules out an internal short, and says the
overheat was therefore probably from oscillation. The cause of the overheat
could therefore be any of several things, including a momentary load
failure, at the intended frequency.
I had not realized that you had postd to the list, as well as to me.
Hope this helps.
Bill-W4BSG
At 06:52 AM 1/8/01 -0800, you wrote:
>>Rich- I DID make a mistake, but not about the question you put below. The
>>letter DID 'mention' parasitics, but the phrase they used that you asked
>>about- 'oscilltion condition' does not mean parasitic, it means any
>>oscillation. Normal operation is also an 'oscillation condition'. Do you
>>differ with this definition and claim that only parasitics are 'oscillation
>>conditions'?
>>
>enough
>
>- Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
>end
>
>
-
Bill Aycock W4BSG EM64vr
Jackson County, AL
W4BSG is "vanity" this time, but was
earned by exam in 1954, the first time.
w4bsg@arrl.net
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|