Bob Marston wrote:
>Ian White wrote:
>
>>Please don't get sucked into Rich's opportunistic personal attacks
>>against Eimac staff.
>
>Ian I don't pretend to know Rich's motivation for his "personal attacks".
He has now told us all... again.
>What I do know is that Care and Feeding has been up on the Web in its
>nearly totally incomplete state for at least 2 years. If Eimac has any
>sense of professional ethics and does NOT give a Rat's Ass about C&F, which
>they apparently don't, they would have the sense to delete that link from
>their Web Page Entirely.
I agree that Eimac <as a company> made a mistake over C&F, and continues
to make a mistake in not pulling those pages and re-thinking what needs
to be done. But a mistake is an "involuntary error" - it doesn't impugn
the company's "sense of professional ethics".
My point is that it's wrong to attribute personal blame. We don't know
who was responsible for demanding that C&F be updated on the cheap with
no significant budget, but I'll bet it wasn't the unfortunate project
manager.
What I think is very wrong is to take this as an opportunity to publicly
attack one person within the company, in an attempt to settle an old
score.
73 from Ian G3SEK Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book'
'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
http://www.ifwtech.com/g3sek
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|