I can see it and I'm telling you so.! I never quantified it, just said
it existed - like parasitics and arcing do.
Paul
In message <200101042021.f04KL8c11803@paris.akorn.net>, Tom Rauch
<w8ji@contesting.com> writes
>> Nothing complicated needed to see this - just use an ordinary power/SWR
>> meter and turn the power down on the ICOM. Watch the meter when you key
>> the rig.
>>
>> Paul
>
>Hi Paul,
>
>No way. You only see a tiny bit of the actual spike.
>
>You can not see the peak power that way, even with many peak
>reading meters.
>
>It takes a fast meter with a long storage time or a storage scope
>(or one with long persistence and high intensity and horizontal
>sweep off) to see the real peak.
>
>
>
>
>> In message <008c01c0761b$2715ab60$2a28dd18@speedchoice.com>, Mike Baker
>> <k7dd@earthlink.net> writes > >The subject of this string of e-mail has me
>> paying attention as I own a >IC-706MKIIG of fairly early serial number and
>> have never noticed a "spike" >on the leading or trailing edge of the
>> transmitted signal on CW or SSB. >There is a "normal"amount of "overshoot"
>> to the wave form in CW but it is >not more than about 7%, maybe. These
>> results are from my ole Heath IO-10 >monitor scope. In fact, untill it
>> was mentioned on this reflector, the only >rig I was aware of (ICOM) that
>> had the problem big time was the 775DSP. >What is the approx length of the
>> pulse we are talking about here?? And, as >was asked in the original
>> note, has anyone come up with an internal "fix" to >the problem? Is the
>> pulse on any mode or only a perticular mode? >Thanks in advance for your
>> time.. >Mike Baker K7DD >k7dd@earthlink.net >Peoria, AZ. > > >-- >FAQ on
>> WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps >Submissions:
>> amps@contesting.com >Administrative requests:
>> amps-REQUEST@contesting.com >Problems:
>> owner-amps@contesting.com > >
>>
>> --
>>
>> To try and not succeed is better than not to try at all (Anon)
>>
>> --
>> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
>> Submissions: amps@contesting.com
>> Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>> Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
>>
>
>
>73, Tom W8JI
>w8ji@contesting.com
>
--
To try and not succeed is better than not to try at all (Anon)
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|