I agree. Besides that, Alpha is, for several reasons,
a success story, and I'm glad to see they're back.
73 Paul K7CW
--- Chuck Counselman <ccc@space.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> At 10:57 PM -0500 2000/12/28, Bob Marston wrote:
> > . . . most hams are too
> >rich and too lazy to attempt to build their own
> amp....
>
>
> I understand your sentiment and share it to some
> extent, but I also think
> you're being unfair. Life is too short for any of
> us to learn and do
> everything. A person must set priorities and make
> choices. Some of us
> have designed and built things more challenging than
> amps. Some of us
> study propagation. Others work on digital
> signal-processing. For others
> it's antennas. Some of us restore boat-anchors.
> There's more to hamming
> than amps. Just because a ham buys rather than
> builds an amp doesn't mean
> he's lazy.
>
> 73 de Chuck W1HIS
>
>
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW:
> http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
> Submissions: amps@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:
> amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online!
http://photos.yahoo.com/
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|