Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] SB-220 Smoke Test

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] SB-220 Smoke Test
From: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 05:47:48 -0700
>
>Did you actually mean to say VLF parasitics?
>
?  Just how this is possible is somewhat less than obvious.   

Welcome to the Rauchian world,  Mike

>--- Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com> wrote:
>> 
>> > Ä  When I spoke with Tom on the telephone, he told
>> me that he had 
>> > repaired about 400 SB-220s and that he had seen
>> lots of parasitic damage. 
>> 
>> What I actually said was I saw some damage under
>> some load 
>> conditions that appeared to be VLF parasitics. I
>> have duplicated 
>> that when the chokes were in place across the grid
>> caps by 
>> placing the correct load on the output port.  
>>  
>> 
>> 73, Tom W8JI
>> w8ji@contesting.com
>> 
>> --
>> FAQ on WWW:              
>> http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
>> Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
>> Administrative requests: 
>> amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>> Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>> 
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
>http://im.yahoo.com/
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
>Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>
>


-  Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.  
end


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>