To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [AMPS] Ameritron AL-811H |
From: | W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch) |
Date: | Mon, 28 Aug 2000 04:35:26 -0400 |
> The best advantage I can think of is that the 572 is continued in > production, whereas the 811A was announced as being dropped. > > Makes me want to go with the 572B ...and where does that little bit of misinformation spring from? 73, Tom W8JI w8ji@contesting.com -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [AMPS] Thanks, Phil (VA3UX) |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [AMPS] Off course query, Ian Roberts |
Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] Ameritron AL-811H, Jeff Wolf |
Next by Thread: | [AMPS] Off course query, Ian Roberts |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |