Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] 2000 ARRL Handbook question

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] 2000 ARRL Handbook question
From: rfamps@ic24.net (Steve Thompson)
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2000 09:23:59 +0100

-----Original Message-----
From: measures <2@vc.net>
To: Steve Thompson <rfamps@ic24.net>; amps <amps@contesting.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Date: 04 August 2000 15:41
Subject: Re: [AMPS] 2000 ARRL Handbook question


>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: measures <2@vc.net>
>>To: Tom Rauch <W8JI@contesting.com>; amps <amps@contesting.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
>>Date: 03 August 2000 16:31
>>Subject: RE: [AMPS] 2000 ARRL Handbook question
>>snip
>>I think the question was from Peter Chadwick
>>>>> Rich, you've lost me here. To me Q is (in this context) XL/r. Let's
have
>>r
>>>>> constant with frequency; XL increases with frequency. Therefore the Q
of
>>>>> an inductor rises as the frequency goes up, doesn't it?
>>>
>>>no
>>
>>Rich, would you mind taking a moment to explain your answer?
>
>Resistance is not constant with frequency.  Resistance increases as
>frequency increases.  The Q of R/L VHF suppressors decreases with
>frequency.  see Wes' measurements.
>
>cheers, Steve
>
>-  Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
Ah - ok. I think Peter was referring to just an inductor in his comment, not
the whole suppressor.

Steve


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>