>
>Phil Clements wrote:
>>
>>I pulled up the subscriber list yesterday...there are some 425
>>subscribers to "AMPS." Since I am no spring chicken, and
>>did not just fall off the turnip truck onto this reflector, I think I
>>can safely say that there are at least 200-300 of us out here in
>>cyberville that would like to know the following:
>>
>>1. What was the intended "mission" of the "DAF amplifier?
>>
>> a. to save money
>> b. to get higher power out of a tube than by other classes of operation
>> c. to use a tube that is not normally suited for linear amp use
>> d. to gain notoriaty for the "inventor"
>> e. all of the above
>> f. none of the above
>>
>>Inquiring minds would like to know!!!
>
>
>Let G2DAF speak for himself - you can download his original articles
>from my web site.
>
>
I read the original article, Ian. Thanks. Thornley makes no mention of
how he managed to get around the 3/2-power law. Also, there is no
mention about the grid/screen phase difference problem. My guess is
that Thornley would not have got this article past *QST*'s technical
editor George Grammer.
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.
cheers.
- Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
end
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|