Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] RE: Re: Re: Mission Impossible

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] RE: Re: Re: Mission Impossible
From: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se)
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 14:58:18 +0100
> > Jan asks;
> > 
> > >You say below that signals was clean but distorted due to too 
>much speech
> > processing.How can a signal be clean and distorted at the same 
>time?
> > 
> > By 'clean', I mean not excessively wide - or, if you like, the 
>occupied
> > bandwidth is correct for the voice modulated single sideband 
> signal.
> 
> I agree Peter. 
> 
> If distortion occurs in front of the filters, there can be horrible 
> distortion yet nice narrow bandwidth.
>
Absolutley
> 
> On the opposite side of the coin a signal that sounds very clean on 
> the operating frequency can be very wide.
>
Yes indeed, never stated anything different.
> 
> One has nothing to do with the other. How you "sound" on the 
> operating frequency doesn't always have anything to do with 
> bandwidth. That is why an oscilloscope can't tell you anything 
> about bandwidth.
>
Also true, again never stated anything different. 
> 
> 73, Tom W8JI
> w8ji@contesting.com
>
Still I insist, I would never ever call a distorted signal
clean, sorry guys!
You tend to drift away from the issue, someone needs to be
temperature compensated!

73, Jim SM2EKM


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>