Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Re: SSB interference

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Re: SSB interference
From: Jan.E.Holm@telia.se (Jan.E.Holm@telia.se)
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 09:03:22 +0100

Indeed, that´s what I ask myself too. I don´t like or want to
beleive that but maybe that´s the case after all.

de SM2EKM
----------------------------------
-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från:   mike@g0mjw.freeserve.co.uk [SMTP:mike@g0mjw.freeserve.co.uk]
Skickat:         den 6 mars 2000 18:58
Till:   rbigg@pcola.gulf.net; amps@contesting.com
Ämne:   VB: Re: [AMPS] SSB interference


> I don't want to ever put out a bad signal.  I'm thankful that I have a
> means, through other hams on the net I check into, to give me a 
reading of
> relative signal quality.  Is there a better way.

Many Ks worth of test equipment will give a quantitative result rather 
than
a qualitative one.

Is it possible that some of the IMDs were generated deliberately ?


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
 <<Fil: Re_ [AMPS] SSB interference.TXT>> 


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [AMPS] Re: SSB interference, Jan.E.Holm@telia.se <=