Svetlana has been on the market since the late 19th century. Quality is the
main avantage I think...
-----Èñõîäíîå ñîîáùåíèå-----
Îò: sm5ki <sm5ki@algonet.se>
Êîìó: UT7CT --> Anton Koval <tony@uch.net>; amps@contesting.com
<amps@contesting.com>; Steve Bookout <nj4f@erols.com>
Äàòà: 27 ôåâðàëÿ 2000 ã. 9:38
Òåìà: SV: [AMPS] 4CX800's vs 4CX1600
>I have often been wondering why have the match problem of two 4CX800 tubes?
>Would it not be better to always use one 4cx1600B tube? Of course the
latter
>tube will easier generate parasitics because its ability to amplify at
>higher frequencies than the 4CX800.
>
>By the way, when is SVETLANA coming out with a direct replacement of the
>3-500Z? There has been rumours of a 3-600Z tube, I heard. Since EIMAC
>stopped manufacturing the tube it is very difficult to find anything
similar
> reliable on the market. I recently saw a HENRY 2K3 with the original
>graphite 3-500Zs from early sixties in good shape.
>
>Why buy SVETLANA 3cx800s when EIMAC has a much longer manufacturing
>experience? The very small price difference does not motivate buying
>SVETLANA. Or is their quality higher?
>
>Is there, by the way, a reliable source for 3CX1000A7s with sockets?
>
>
> Hans/SM5KI
>
>
>----------
>>Från: "UT7CT --> Anton Koval" <tony@uch.net>
>>Till: <amps@contesting.com>, "Steve Bookout" <nj4f@erols.com>
>>Ämne: Re: [AMPS] 4CX800's vs 4CX1600
>>Datum: lör 26 feb 2000 23.41
>>
>
>>
>> Dear Steve,
>>
>> The 4CX800A (GU-74B) tube is rated at about 800 W, the 4CX1600
(GS-23B)
>>is rated at 1600 - 2000 W and works well over 1000 mHz.
>> More technical data in English can be found at my site at
>>http://www.qsl.net/ut7ct
>> 73 !
>>-----------
>>UT7CT Ham Radio Devices - Fine range of CT
>>Hand Keys & Paddles. Collectable keys. Svetlana
>>PA tubes and much more at http://www.qsl.net/ut7ct
>>tony@uch.net ICQ#19487420
>>
>>
>>-----Èñõîäíîå ñîîáùåíèå-----
>>Îò: Steve Bookout <nj4f@erols.com>
>>Êîìó: amps@contesting.com <amps@contesting.com>
>>Äàòà: 27 ôåâðàëÿ 2000 ã. 1:40
>>Òåìà: [AMPS] 4CX800's vs 4CX1600
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Hello all,
>>>
>>>Anyone care to comment on what the advantages/disadvantages of either
tube
>>>arrangement in an amp, all other things being relatively equal.
>>>
>>>I would expect mainly the cost.
>>>
>>>73 de Steve, NR4M
>>>
>>>---------------------------------------------
>>>Steve Bookout, NR4M (ex NJ4F)
>>>Rapidan Data Systems
>>>
>>>'DX4WIN...The way logging programs should be!'
>>>Free demo at http://www.erols.com/pvander
>>>
>>>--
>>>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
>>>Submissions: amps@contesting.com
>>>Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>>>Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
>>>Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
>>Submissions: amps@contesting.com
>>Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>>Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
>>Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>>
>>
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|