>
>Jan.E.Holm@telia.se wrote:
>>
>> With 100W drive and 3kV on a pair of 4-400´s it might
>> be a problem to get 1500 out, better run 4 kV on plates.
>> I have a 3 tube 4-400 amp 10 - 160m and it runs excelent.
>> After 20 years of service it still runs full output and
>> the tubes wasn´t even new back then, I run slightly less
>> then 4kV on them and they are GG. If you have the hardware
>> for a 3 tuber that´s the way to go.
>>
>> 73, Jim SM2EKM
>>
>> PS: You can use the same tuned input as a SB-220 (or similar)
>> uses and just tweak it.
>
>Hi Jim,
>
>Thanks for the reply. Your idea of a 3 holer sounds neat. I wasn't
>expecting to get more than 1200 watts out from a pair of gg 4-400's. I
>think that's about all you can do assuming 60% efficiency in class AB
>without exceeding their plate dissipation.
>
>I'm curious what values you used in your tank circuit. The problem that
>I see with 3 tubes is the increased Cout (plate to gnd) that the pi-L
>network will see. It's probably not a problem on 160 through 40, but
>the Q of the network must be pretty high on 10m.
? With three tubes vs. one tube on 10m, you need three times as much
C-tune to establish the desired Q. Another old wives' tale of amateur
radio bites the dust.
>
>BTW, the bottles that I will be using are the pulse rated version of the
>4-400, the 4PR400A (8188). I have 5 of them.
>
? I would not hesitate to run up to 5kV on SSB, Charlie Output should
be about 1100w per each, pep. Dissipation would be about 650w. Key-down
tuneup would, of course, be nutz. // . The SB-220 clearly has The
cooling system that produced the lowest envelope temperature.
good luck.
- Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|