Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] G2DAF circuit and pictures

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] G2DAF circuit and pictures
From: philk5pc@tyler.net (Phil Clements)
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 10:25:24 -0600
It would be nice if someone would put up a schematic of a DAF
amplifier so those of us who have no earthly clue of what you guys
have been talking about for lo these many weeks can see it.

>From what I have read so far here on the reflector about the DAF,
I think Al Gore would call it a "risky amp scheme."

(((73)))
Phil, K5PC

> At 01:55 PM 12/23/99 +0100, Lars Harlin wrote:
> >
> >Hi all!
> >
> >First version of G2DAF website is out there now. There is more to come,
> but if you like to have a preview
> >take a look at: www.pocab.se/amp/g2daf.htm
> >
> >Merry X-mas to all of you!
> >
> >Lars /SM3BDZ
>
> Lars,
>
> Nicely done amps.
>
> I hesitate to get involved in the DAFfy discussion, but....
>
> After many years of using spectrum analyzers to make similar measurements,
> I'd have to say the single plot you provided would not convince me your
> argument is correct. It's way too easy to produce a misleading plot by
> inappropriate instrument setup. I know, I've done it many times myself.
>
> Now, understand, I'm not saying you are wrong. What I am saying is that you
> will have to show me more than that one plot before I am convinced either way.
>
> Just for the record, I believe there is no reason why , given proper
> selection of tube and operating conditions, the DAF circuit couldn't
> deliver stated performance. However, given the nature of hams, I also
> believe that for every correctly built DAF, there are at least a hundred
> incorrectly built and operated by "cult members".
>
> So, the only question I have is "Why Bother?". With the abundance of tubes
> suitable for GG and TCGG configuration and the virtual guarantee of
> performance, there seems to be no practical reason the mess with DAF types.
> Unless, of course, it is indeed a "cult" thing.
>
>
>
> 73,
>
> Larry - W7IUV
> w7iuv@arrl.net
> http://www.axtek.com/w7iuv
> Amp pix at http://207.108.137.61
>
>
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
> Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
> Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
>



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>