Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] <inget ämne>

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] <inget ämne>
From: sm5ki@algonet.se (Hans Goldschmidt)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 07:26:29 +0200
>As published in QST years ago:
>
>The blocking condenser is in series with the two variable condensers in
>paralell and the latter will charge up to a DC voltage depending on their
>position because the condensers are a DC voltage divider across the anode
>supply . If your antenna does not represent a DC short across the output C2,
>this condenser will  eventually arc over because  its usually lower volts
>rating. You will get small burns lowering the voltage rating and it will
>then flash over with less rf also.The reason one originally put this RFC
>across the output of the amplifier was not only to eventually protect the
>power supply but also to get away from this flash over problem and, of
>course, to ( hopefully ) protect the antenna and its user from the very
>dangerous anode voltage supply. The voltage rating of the series condenser
>from anode to the output pi or piL filter has in many linears a little and
>very dangerous low safety factor against flash over and should in many cases
>have had a much higher voltage and current rating.
>
>73s de Hans / SM5KI
>-----

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>