R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?

To:	<amps@contesting.com>
Subject:	R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?
From:	measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
Date:	Thu, 5 Aug 1999 13:36:19 -0700



>
>
>> 
>> Rich says:
>> 
>The Eimac definition of R/XC1 is one.  The other definition of Q
>is a lot more complicated and gives a different result.  I use Eimac Q.
>I am lazy.  
>> 
>
>"a different result" , huh?
>That says a lot.
>
The difference is not large, Mike.  


Rich...

R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures  


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, (continued) R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Peter Chadwick R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Rich Measures R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Peter Chadwick R: R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, <i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara) R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Peter Chadwick R: R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, <i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara) R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Rich Measures R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Peter Chadwick R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Gilmer, Mike R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Rich Measures R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Rich Measures <= R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Rich Measures R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Peter Chadwick R: R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, <i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara) R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Peter Chadwick [AMPS] Rich's Q meaning, Tom Rauch

Previous by Date:	R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Rich Measures
Next by Date:	R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Rich Measures
Previous by Thread:	R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Rich Measures
Next by Thread:	R: [AMPS] L-Pi net...downside?, Rich Measures
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]