>Gentlemen:
>I subscribed to AMPS to get educated after 35 years of barefootness.
>Over past couple of months, and especially the past few weeks, my
>perception is that at least 50% of all messages on this reflector have
>been insults, flames, personal cheap shots, and the like.
>
>There are some extremely knowledgeable folks on this list, but
>unfortunately much of their useful technical knowledge is constantly
>hidden under gigantic mounds of ego and nasty attitude. If, however, the
>intent is to keep the AMPS subscription list small for the benefit of
>those types of folks, then I am mistaken here and you guys are doing a
>fine job.
>
>FWIW, the TowerTalk, R-390, Hammarlund, and even the Collins folks
>participate in what appear to be much larger lists than AMPS without
>employing nastiness or personally-directed venom, so I know it can be
>done.
>
>Thank you all for the few useful technical things I have gleaned during
>lulls in the fighting, and best wishes to you all. And I promise I won't
>let the door hit me on the way out. :)
>
>73, Jerry W5KP
Jerry, this is "the Mr Miklos" list. Did you belive it was about Amps ? :)
-To be or not to be- is the key question here.
73's
Hakan/ SM3LBN
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
>Submissions: amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
>Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|