Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] More on the SB220

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] More on the SB220
From: wfairclo@netcom.ca (Walter Fairclough)
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 10:31:43 -0500
Checked out the SB-220 this morning for damage. The only component that blew
was the 0.82 ohm resistor. I noticed that the resistor is of the metal film
type with a 2W rating, manufactured by Phillips. Heath manual calls for a
wirewound resistor rated at 2W.  When the original big blow happened last
year, I had replaced Harbach's .82 ohm 3W WW with the 2W metal film type. Is
this significant?

In response to queries by members of the group, yes, I had already made Rich
Measures 110V bias mod.

In all the years that I spent working on high power transmitters, I have
never witnessed a failure caused by a parasitic when the transmitter was
powered but unkeyed. That's why I'm having a hard time accepting that the
fault was caused by a parasitic. But, of course, that's not to say that its
not possible.

I must say that mods I have done have at least prevented widespread damage.

I'll see what the answers are regarding the resistor before I decide on
making some radical changes.

Walter - VE3EN





Walter Fairclough
wfairclo@netcom.ca


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>