Rich Measures wrote:
>>Well, even Eimac realise that, and their web site has had a "co-
>>operative writing project" under way for some time. Unfortunately they
>>seem to be going about it in entirely the wrong way.
>>
>? As I understand it, Ian, the person who is in charge of the rewrite
>project is the same "expert" (p.72, Sept, 1994, *QST*) who wrote:
>"Measures' inference that modern tubes used in linear amplifiers have
>inherent "VHF parasitic oscillations" is incorrect.
Sorry, Rich, I'm absolutely not prepared to get involved in your
personal disputes with Eimac.
73 from Ian G3SEK Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book'
'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
http://www.ifwtech.demon.co.uk/g3sek
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|