Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] YC-156

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] YC-156
From: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 19:21:18 -0500


On Tue, 23 Feb 1999 09:28:23 -0800 Rich Measures <measures@vc.net>
writes:
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>> >
>>> >The draw backs of this tube. The filament is of the Oxide Coated
>>> >Unipotential type. 15 Volts at 14 amps with a 6 Minute warmup time 
>and no
>>> >one rebuilds them. Secondly they have a fairly high output 
>capacitance
>>> >(36pf) So even though they have a max freq spec of 110Mhz your
>>> >not going to match them up with a pi-network on 10 Meters.
>>> >
>>> ?  At QRP levels, this is undoubtedly true because RL would be 
>abnormally
>>> high.  Increase the anode current to normal, RL drops to a 
>reasonable
>>> level, and a match is easy.  One of the greater old-wives' tales of
>>> amateur radio is that adding another tube doubles  C-out which 
>renders
>>> the amplifier unusuable on 10m.   However, when a second tube is 
>added,
>>> RL is cut in half, and that doubles the C needed for C-tune.  Thus, 
>it is
>>> not the anode-C / Cout which causes a match prob. on 10m, it is the 
>ratio
>>> of Cout to RL.
>>>
>>
>>This is the third (in addition to the larger filament power and 
>cooling
>>requirements) problem with using "tubes with handles" at amateur 
>power
>>levels.  
>
>?  One of the advantages of using the 8171 at amateur power levels is 
>that its 7" (178mm)  anode-cooler needs only a 1700-rpm blower instead 
>of 
>a 3400-rpm blower, which makes Much More Noise.
>
>>When underdriven the RL goes quite high  - a 3CPX5000/YC-156
>>will be about 10K Ohms and the 8171/8170 may reach 15 K (assuming 
>6500
>>and 7500 volts respectively on the anodes, 60% efficiency and 1500 
>watts
>>out).  
>
>?  For an 8171 or 8170, the optimum RL is approx. 1100-ohms.    When I 
>
>ran one, I would tune-up at full throttle using a tuning-pulser, and 
>then 
>back the microphone gain off until the tube showed no increase in 
>anode 
>current during ssb modulation -- i.e., Class A operation.  Under these 
>
>conditions, the power gain was roughly 10db and eff. was probably c. 
>33%. 
> If needed to maintain communications during episodes of deliberate 
>interference, or whatever, the microphone gain could be advanced 
>appropriately.  
>
>>As I recall, tube geometry is optimized for design voltages and
>>running the tubes with significantly reduced anode (and screen) 
>voltages
>>will result in lower efficiency and higher IMD.
>>
>?  In Class A operation,  total IMD is in the neighborhood of -50db 
>below 
>pep.

And as you asked in another post....who has an exciter capable of -50dB
IMD?

Cheers...Carl





>>
>-  cheers, Joe.  
>
>
>
>Rich...
>
>R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures  
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
>Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
>

___________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>