>Rich Measures wrote:
>........
>>In Wes'
>>measurements, he uses the term "Ls". What is "Ls", Mr. White?
>
>Copied and pasted directly from Wes's own page: "the measured effective
>(series) inductance".
>
Mr. White: You, sir, are correct. Sorry for the confusion.
Henceforth, I propose that "Lsu" designate the vhf parasitic
suppressor's inductor, and that "Rsu". designate the suppressor's
resistor.
>In other words, Ls is the effective inductance that produces the
>effective series reactance Xs
ok
As you see it, at 100MHz:
What was the inductance of the copper-wire Lsu?
What was the inductance of the resistance-wire Lsu?
At 100MHz, the measured Q of the copper-wire suppressor was 2.2, and the
measured Q of the resistance-wire suppressor was 1.5. How do you account
for VHF-Q being c. 46% higher in the copper-wire suppressor? What change
would you make to the copper-wire suppressor to decrease its VHF-Q to 1.5?
- thanks
Rich...
R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|