To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [AMPS] Re: Parasitics |
From: | measures@vc.net (Rich Measures) |
Date: | Sat, 16 May 98 09:34:20 -0800 |
>Rich Measures wrote: > >[G3SEK wrote:] >........ >>Rp is 49.26 ohms. The 100 ohm suppressor R is in parallel with the >>95.6nH suppressor inductor, which Wes calls Ls. 93.46 ohms is not the >>resistance of the suppressor R. > >On that subject I think we're all out of step except you, Rich. > Were Wes' measurements made with 200nH (roughly 10-inches of wire) inserted between the device under test and the test instrument? Rich... R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [AMPS] AL-800H vs Alpha 76A, lu7dw@abaconet.com.ar |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [AMPS] Re: Parasitics, Ian White, G3SEK |
Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] Re: Parasitics, km1h@juno.com |
Next by Thread: | [AMPS] Re: Parasitics, Ian White, G3SEK |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |