Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] My try at unravelling the knotty VHF-Rp Enigma

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] My try at unravelling the knotty VHF-Rp Enigma
From: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Thu, 14 May 98 17:19:32 -0500
>In an idealized parallel R-L network (no other sources of losses, no
>stray inductances or capacitances) Rp would always be identical to the
>resistor value, at all frequencies. 
>
>In practice it is not. Losses in the L tend to make Rp lower. Stray
>inductance in series with the paralleled network tends to make the
>measured value of Rp larger (as I showed over the weekend, even a
>fraction of an inch of lead wire can have a major effect).

I think this has been what Rich has been trying to say all along.  Lower 
Rp means lower VHF gain.  Rich's supressor inductors are lossy and so as 
you say: losses in the L tend to make Rp lower.

Works for me...

73,

Jon
KE9NA


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Ogden

jono@webspun.com
www.qsl.net/ke9na

"A life lived in fear is a life half lived."


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>