Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] 6M Linear designs

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] 6M Linear designs
From: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 21:25:37 EST
My own message bounced back...not sure why.
Sorry if this a dupe.

73  Carl  KM1H



On Wed, 12 Nov 1997 08:59:59  km1h writes:
>
>On Wed, 12 Nov 1997 14:13:53 +1300 Martin Ellis <jmellis@ihug.co.nz> 
>writes:
>>Carl wrote
>>> The 6M amps I build use a regular Pi-Network, same as an HF amp.
>>> The only difference is that more of the Tune C is in the tube
>>> than at 10M. Since the parasitic frequencies of the 572B is
>>> close to 6M it becomes harder to suppress without excessive
>>> loss in the suppressor.
>>
>>Good morning Carl,
>>The best looking homebrew 6m linear I have seen was made by
>>Jim WA7JCO in Phoenix AZ.  He showed me >1.5kw keydown on 6m 
>>with an 8877.  There was no parallel plate capacitor - instead
>>he used a vacuum variable as a tunable series capacitor.
>>This replaced the blocking capacitor, and by placing a 
>>capacitor in series with the <large> anode capaciance
>>it enabled an efficient tank Q to be achieved.
>>I believe he told me that no suppressor circuit was required
>>in this case.
>>Hope my rough drawing helps.
>
>Thats an interesting approach Martin. The drawback however is that the 
>cap must be able to sustain DC and the RF and being a low  C value it 
>would have a somewhat high reactance at 50 MHz. Not an easy task for 
>an air variable at QRO levels. 
>
>The 8877 is not as bad as some for output C. The trick is to build or 
>modify an air variable that has a very low minimum C and use in a 
>conventional Pi-Net. Vacuums are nice but complicate the mechanical 
>layout.
>I have even modified a few LK-800A's for 6M and that uses three 
>3CX800A7's. There is not much variable C available for that mod but 
>enough to completely tune and push 2800W out the pipe with 100W of 
>drive.  No parasitic suppressors either. 
>
>My conversions are of existing HF amps so I am limited in what I can 
>do...... and also stay within budget!  I have been very pleased with 
>the results since the efficiencies obtained are every bit as good as 
>when stock HF (on the best band). 
>
>Getting a suppressor design that worked for the glass tubes was a 
>challenge since the RF deck layouts were not the best to start with. 
>
>73   Carl   KM1H 
>
>
>>
>>
>>       Tune        L
>>        Cap
>> --------||-|--^^^^^^^^^-|--------- output
>> |          |            |          
>> |          (            | 
>>---         (           --- Load Cap
>>Anode       (           ---
>>8877    RFC (            |
>>            (            |
>>            |           Gnd 
>>      |-----|
>>      |    ---
>>      |    --- bypass
>>      |     |
>>      HV    Gnd       
>>
>>Regards
>>Martin ZL1ANJ
>>
>>--
>>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
>>Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
>>Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>>Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>>Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>>

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>