Sandy,
The right to define the list policy is belong to list owner who pays for.
I didn't see until now limitations on freedom of speech on this
list and we saw already some very controversial issues and bad
language.
I personally don't see anything wrong in posting interesting
issues as far are related to AMPS. I beleive that any input
from manufacturers or dealers is useful for all of us. I would like
to see more. Also, sharing with others the experience or
interesting news who can save money to the list subscribers,
is more than welcome.
The only problem is ( in my opinion ) if the list owner is ready
to pay for BW of some kind of advertising. But this is only his
bussines.
73 de Morel, 4X1AD
----------
From: Sandy Meltzer[SMTP:sandy@sandy.com]
Sent: eai cieue 06 ?aaiao 1997 21:13
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: [AMPS] An open response to Tom, W8JI
Hello all,
First, I like to apologize to everyone on this mailing list if the two
Alpha ads I posted yesterday were inappropriate. As a new recipient of
this list, I didn't see any policy information from the "owner" of this
list, Bill Fisher - W4AN except the following information from the "Welcome
to amps" message I initially received:
Welcome to the RF Amplifier Mail Reflector
This reflector is devoted to the discussion of RF amplifiers.
...................
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|