Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] QST Review...

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] QST Review...
From: kc2x@inspace.net (Steve Sacco KC2X)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 1997 21:07:40 -0400
Actually, what struck me MOST about this review was that it reinforced just
how good the Ten-Tec Titan is.  

QST reviewed the Titan in April, 1986, and their testing showed "All
spurious and harmonic emissions are at least 66 dB below the fundamental
output.  

Is it correct to compare that number against, say the 45/49 dB numbers QST
measured from the 91B?

Steve KC2X


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [AMPS] QST Review..., Steve Sacco KC2X <=