Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] parasitics

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] parasitics
From: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net)
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 1997 12:23:28 +0000
> From:          Peter Chadwick <Peter.Chadwick@gpsemi.com>
> To:            "'amps'" <amps@contesting.com>
> Subject:       [AMPS] parasitics
To: <amps@contesting.com>
> Date:          Fri, 22 Aug 97 10:30:42 +0000

> Rich suggests small resistors for MOSFET parasitic suppression. I agree
> - I've found that approach far more reliable in production, and cheaper.
> They also work well on small triodes in cathode followers and the like -
> E88CC/6DJ8's  are very prone to parasitics, but 22 ohms in the plate
> lead works wonders.

Good example Peter.

Higher series resistance almost always decreases high frequency 
response or gain.

When I design a VHF suppressor, I try for a series resistance that 
dominates the anode load impedance. Lower series resistance will 
at the frequency of instability will almost always decrease 
stability.

73 Tom

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [AMPS] parasitics, Peter Chadwick
    • [AMPS] parasitics, w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net <=